![]() It's significantly better than the Flux 1.0 and as good as the CycleOps Hammer 1.0. The Flux S has a smooth pedalling feel that's as close to feeling like you're actually riding a bike as any trainer I've used. Plug in an ANT+ dongle to your computer – Tacx makes an excellent one – fire up your chosen software and away you go. Trainers that use the ANT+ FE-C control and communication protocol are usually very easy to set up, and that's the case here. Calling this version the Flux S helps draw a line under that unfortunate episode. Tacx did about as good a job of dealing with the problems as anyone I've ever seen deal with a quality problem in the bike industry, but it unarguably hurt. The original Flux was plagued with reliability problems. It's now claimed to be accurate to 3% versus the original's 5%, but the original was better than 5% accurate anyway – as long as you got a good one.Īnd that's largely what's going on here, of course. ![]() In terms of overall function, it's true that the Flux S is largely unchanged from the original Flux. If you were cynical you might say that the Tacx Flux S is just a rebadged version of the original Tacx Flux smart trainer from a couple of years ago, but that's to underplay what Tacx has achieved here, with a high-quality wheel-off trainer for just over £500. It's still decent value, but it now has stiff competition from other budget direct-drive trainers. The successor to the original budget direct-drive trainer, Tacx's Flux S is easy to use, measures your power to a useful level of accuracy and consistency, and works with popular virtual riding applications such as Zwift to make indoor training less dull.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |